It attempts to describe the present state of the relationship between deity and humanity, as being a broken relationship or agreement. It accounts for this idea with imagery that includes all humans in the consequences. In this case it means humans busted it, and now can't fix it.
This begs the question of a deity. And it also begs the question of the validity of your conjecture.
Further, if "humans busted it" then God did not plan an EXACT scenario for humankind. If humans are responsible...God is not. It is silly to think of God as being prescient of that which he was, is, or will be...not responsible for. If God knows, or knew, the "choices" of humankind, then, of course, God would have pre-ordained and forced those choices. we call it Hobson's choice. It would thus be ridiculous to say that "humans busted it", while still asserting that God "planned it" and knew it--and set it down in advance through Salman Farsi, or whomever... |
