Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 36.20

+0.1%

Dec 26 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Road Walker who wrote (145395)	10/16/2001 11:22:18 AM
From: Ali Chen	of 186894

"Intel is reporting the MHz of their processor, in the same way it has been reported since the PC was invented." I see you are very persistent in your crusade. Didn't you admit on AMD thread that you have little idea what the definition of "frequency" is: Message 16450087 Message 16453320 Message 16453367 And then, even after a couple of lengthy explanations,e.g. Message 16452749 Message 16453367 you still insist on your fallacy? People are telling you, MHz is not equal to performance. One last time, an example you might be comfortable with: Intel Itanic running at 800MHz, spec.org posted performance score of 701 (SPECfp2000). At the same time, a Pentium-4 processor running at 1900 MHz, spec.org scores on the same benchmark at 696. I think you are not going to accuse Intel of using "different frequency standards" on their own processors? - Ali

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next