SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Atin who wrote (48017)10/17/2001 1:44:26 AM
From: paul_philp  Read Replies (2) of 54805
 

It is certainly not a technology "lock" which is what I thought a "gorilla" required. Is there more to IOS that I don't understand?


The command line interface (CLI) is probably less than 1% of what IOS does. The meat of IOS are the routing algorithms. Even though IP and the routing protocols (OSPF, BGP) are standards, their implementations are very different. One of the reasons Juniper has been successful is that they made Junos 'bug-compatible' with the routing protocol implementation in IOS. How easy is this to do? Juniper had to hire Tony Li and his team away from Cisco to get the job done. Other routing products that are not compatible 100% with IOS do not stand much of a chance in the market.

As for lock-in, the proper term is switching costs. The cost of switching from IOS is very high. All your tech folks are trained in IOS and all you routing tables are built in IOS.

There is very little question about Cisco's status as a Gorilla.

Paul

p.s. Have you read The Gorilla Game?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext