You almost made some sense this time until that last sentence. Not smug at all, unless you believe that my being convinced that it is important to look at the consequences of ones actions, and to temper the burn 'em nuke talk is smug.
You apparently are po'd because your bs about no one agreeing with me or caring is proven wrong, not only by the pres., but by some of the posters on this board--and some of the things you said, perhaps in the heat of the moment look pretty rediculous in the rereading. After all, you yourself have done some reconstruction of your message.
And as far as I am concerned, you were the one who misused the purpose of PM's. I'm not going to say anything to you in private that I'm unwilling to say in public, and if you pull the bs you did in another PM, I'll do the same thing again.
And yeah, I hope we succeed in taking out the leadership of Afghanistan and Iraq.
Now, in a word about stocks, I think LPAC is worth taking a look at. I own a bunch starting at 3, and Dale's cost basis is a lot lower. It's an A/D postprocessing house for movies and TV shows. Growing market, and LPAC is getting its share. There's a fair amount of discussion about it on Dale's thread. It's biggest problem is that it is so illiquid. |
