SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 231.83+1.7%Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: wanna_bmw who wrote (59183)10/18/2001 8:17:54 PM
From: combjellyRead Replies (2) of 275872
 
"I think that with generally larger die sizes, more .13u fabs for Intel is almost a requirement. In the end"

Think about it. AMD claims that at 0.13 micron, they will be able to supply about 1/3 of the market demand. Now I don't know the size of Intel's fabs, but I suspect that they are in the range of Dresden. So Intel should be able to supply the whole market with 3 fabs. Assuming that 2 of the remaining 3 fabs are 300mm, that means the remaining 3 fabs will be equivalent to 5.5 Dresden fabs. So we would have (8.5/3)*80mm^2 or an average die size of 226mm^2 if they were serving the entire market by themselves. Now if AMD's market share is as high as 10%, that would mean an average die size of ~250mm^2, if 80% an average die size of close to 280mm^2 and so on.

Intel is pushing hard for an over-capacity situation. You will likely disagree, but I don't see how Intel can gain enough market share back to justify that degree of over-production capability. This is a suicide move on Intel's part, there isn't much percentage in running a fab at less that 24/7. It looks like Intel is trying to do what the memory manufacturers are famous for, selling below the cost of production because the costs are too high not to.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext