"You buy stock, you take a chance that it might go down, even if you're Intel."
No. You are not Intel, nor Intel is you. The point you are deliberately missing is that Intel does not hold the shares, it gives them away in a form of stock options for employees, as part of compensation for their labor. During last 4 quarters Intel bought back 121M shares. During the same period the average amount of commons was _maintained_ at the same level - 6,720M shares. Therefore it is obvious that the exact number of shares exercized by employees was bought back, not more, not less. Now understand the balance?
"Corporation's stock buybacks and subsequent +/- movements are not normally factored into quarterly profit/loss statements."
Normally? We yet need to define what does "normally" mean. They are not factored for the reason to deceive mom-n-pop investors, and to preserve an image of success in business while it is not so rosy. This is the well known problem reported to public by Forbes magazine few years ago. If you were to factor those real out-of-pocked money in books, the stock will plummet, the options part of labor compensation will disappear, people will flow away, end of business. Which part of this scheme you do not understand?
- Ali |