SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: maceng2 who wrote (6505)10/21/2001 4:05:05 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
<<They just hate all foreigners except the British..>

LOL, the Australians and New Zealanders have a special hate relationship with the British..
>

Oi-ois [and dinkum Kiwis] aren't racist. They believe firmly in equality and hate the British and all foreigners equally. As you pointed out, "Pommy Bastard" is the appropriate denigratory epithet for poms.

Now that DNA is being fully analyzed, we'll soon be able to select the exact genes which we wish to particularly despise and the precision of language will get a huge boost. No more will Asians be an absurdly generic "Gooks" [the approved Yank term for Asians, who all look the same, which is quite a problem for your average Jerry Springer fan club member], they'll be able to be subdivided right down to individual families and even right down to individuals.

We'll be able to be far more precise than African-American, Irish-American, Asian-American, Japanese-American etc. We'll be able to apply names like the Windsors, [the pommy royal family], with about 42 hyphens in there and that will still be wildly generic.

Maybe we could have bar codes imprinted on our thumbnails [or foreheads], or little chips slipped under our skin and our CDMA cellphones could have scanners which would very precisely define exactly what kind of:

Dago-Wop-Wog-PommyBastard-Yank-Spick-Coon-Coconut-Honky-Nip-Kraut-Nigger-Kike-Poofter-Redskin-Cracker-Chink-Black-Pinko-Shortarse-Fatso-Baldy-Foureyes-Hairyback-Sheila...

subspecies somebody is. I apologize to people who I have left out [I had to cheat and get a reminder from my good buddy Google.com who reminded me of some I would have forgotten]. I did not leave you out because I'm racist [I'm not - heck, some of my best friends are epithetless]. With over 5 billion of us and mutants every day, it's an uphill battle to maintain structure, so cut me some slack.

It's like trying to organize a sensible systematic nomenclature for organic chemistry or check out the crazy latin names botanists have for flora. Then there are all the dinosaurs with absurd names too. Plus all the other multitude of DNA roaming around the planet.

Anyway, how come Anthrax gets to be so popular these days? 15 minutes of fame? And how pathetic is anthrax anyway - can barely keep itself alive and any scungy mouldy bread can kill it!

It's tough staying at the top of the DNA tree and maintaining racial purity and the rightful admiration of the rest of humanity, let alone the stupid carnivores, parasites and bacteria like Anthrax which are so stupid they don't even know they are inferior!

We all know which is the greatest country on this planet and who are the greatest people who have ever lived.

From Eketahuna, [a well-known English suburb <coz their suburbs are named after the British cities and towns>]
Mqurice

PS: HG exhibits a very racist attitude [dumping all those people in Oioiland together in a wild sterotypical generalisation]. Tsk, tsk....
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext