SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 487.71-0.1%Dec 26 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Timetobuy who wrote (61803)10/21/2001 3:06:29 PM
From: David Howe  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
<< I don't go back to Win 3.1 but what I have is quite adequate and will continue to be until there are new applications that soak up memory and drive space. >>

Exactly how so many new computers are sold. Eventually the average consumer stumbles on an application that doesn't work well on their old PC.

They go buy a new one and wham, MSFT sells a new copy of Windows and often times Office.

I bought a recent version of Links 2001 golf game and it's so graphics intense and so realistic that it doesn't run well on my old 300 mhz laptop with 128 Ram. I'm looking for a good deal on the latest PC, probably 1.5 gig or higher.

Obviously when I buy it, MSFT will sell another license of Win XP, and Office. To me. I have no complaints because it's ME that's choosing to buy a new computer because I love to play the Chateau Whistler course that's just north of us and I like to see the scenery in the background in great detail, including the lodge I've stayed at and the birds and clouds that float by.

Can't do that very well on a PC that's more than 3 years old.

Just an example, but one that applies. I'll get a new PC that will also work better in every other respect (ie. digital photography, digital music, even word processing <g>), but it took one particular application to get me to the store.

Dave
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext