Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (7048)	10/23/2001 1:07:05 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) of 281500

>>The officer claims the action was for no other reason other than his close ties and affiliation to Israel. He said this reflected an inherent anti-Semitism in the US intelligence community.<< Sounds like we got the right guy. I also sense a coming shift in our relationship with Israel. >>Israel Adds a Complication to Anti-Terror Diplomacy By harshly denouncing the actions of one of its closest allies, the United States yesterday implicitly acknowledged that its traditional alliance with Israel could gravely complicate its new war on terrorism. The immediate issue is the Israeli government's military offensive into Palestinian territory on the West Bank, which the State Department called "unacceptable." But a larger strategic issue for the United States is preserving Arab participation in the international coalition that the Bush administration is counting on to facilitate and legitimize its war against fundamentalist Muslim terrorists.<< washingtonpost.com Taking a hard line against Israel, getting ready to pounce on Iraq, - are these consistent? And how do they fit with the anti-Saudi Arabia stories being printed these days? Examples of conflicting spin, or a bigger picture that I am not seeing?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next