SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (4140)10/24/2001 9:32:25 AM
From: TheStockFairy  Read Replies (1) of 46821
 
That's an interesting slant. The building wouldn't have to maintain a clli code if the building was only maintained by a single network provider other than the RBOC. Why bother with the CLLI registration when the building owner could call it anything they want...for example, building #1.

The greater problem with that model is the legacy ciruits would need the clli information to be present.

Getting CLLI information is either expensive or takes long. I think I remember the Clones database selling for something in the high hundred thousands plus a look up fee. The alternative is a one by one clli code look up which takes something like a week to get the results back and still costs a couple bucks per building.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News