SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Let's Talk Technical Analyisis (TA)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Chris who started this subject10/24/2001 10:28:49 PM
From: MechanicalMethod  Read Replies (2) of 178
 
Traditional indicators aren't my style. Everyone uses them with the same results.

In the early stage of a project I might ramble:
Message 16513916

The failed code I started there clarified somethings. I want to drop the min+max extreme leaving actual values rather than use a percent of min+max. I've big ideas for this but that's not unusual. Meanwhile I'm finishing up a few things before I start on this, 1 of them is the input I need for this..., and I'm shuffling another project out of the way because this one makes me grin whenever I think about it. :)

If it fails there's 2 more projects on the board after it. Outlined, ready to go. 1 of those interests me a lot also, while the other's something I need to test but wish I just had the results without doing the work.

Feel free to pick apart that thing I posted on the Mac thread or add to it as you see fit. Min+max extremes are filtered so my min+max values are actually "normal" minimum+maximums.

I'm predicting 5 points:
1. next location of my signalLine.
2. minimum H of next pricebar.
3. maximum H of next pricebar.
4. minimum L of next pricebar.
5. maximum L of next pricebar.

If this get's anyone's attention in a big way then PM me because :) hushhhhhh!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext