SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 214.11+3.9%Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (60117)10/25/2001 12:31:13 PM
From: jcholewaRead Replies (4) of 275872
 
> Hammer brings nothing new to the table. AMD already has a
> strong product in Athlon, yet even with that they are
> losing money.

AMD's big loss quarter was simultaneous with the time period in which AMD lost the "performance crown". I do not know if there was a causality, but if there was, then there is some basis for assuming that a higher performing product (from a relative to opponent standpoint) will give them a stronger bottom line.

> Hammer looks like a good product, but it's more of an
> evolutionary step, not a revolutionary one

Given that more evolutionary products than revolutionary succeed in the marketplace, why do you think that this is a bad thing?

> Intel is obviously very tight-lipped over the details
> of McKinley.

That could be either a good thing or a bad thing (probably a mix of both, as is the case with most new product introductions). I expect that McKinley will rather good, though, because it is an evolutionary product and not a revolutionary product.

> Funny how McKinley will arrive before Hammer.

Will it? Can you justify that? How long before McKinley reaches mass production will they have to start pilot production?

-JC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext