SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 252.09-0.3%Jan 29 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TGPTNDR who wrote (60205)10/25/2001 3:01:46 PM
From: wanna_bmwRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
TGPTNDR, Re: "Andy: We knew that the 845 was coming out which would take the Pentium 4 into the business space, we knew XP was coming out, so we wanted to make that price move."
You: "To me that says they ramped the P-4 over the P-III in anticipation that it would be competitive with the XP as opposed to the P-III which wouldn't."


Andy Bryant was talking about Windows XP, not the Athlon XP. I see how it might have sounded confusing, but taken in context, it is quite clear that he meant for Windows XP to be a key selling point for Pentium 4, so price moves would make sense to catch the inflection point with full force.

Re: "<John Joseph>So, the nature of the sequential increase out of disti does not lead you to believe there is an awful lot of inventory in that particular channel.
<Paul>There is zero Intel inventory in that channel that is not meant to be there."


Paul Otellini has always been consistent that Intel doesn't ship more processors than the customers demand. Here, he is once again responding to a question about channel stuffing, and he says that there is no oversupply in the channel.

wanna_bmw
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext