America Under Siege: The End of Innocence Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : America Under Siege: The End of Innocence

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Noneyet who wrote (8565)	10/25/2001 4:03:28 PM
From: lorne	Read Replies (2) of 27666

Hello Thomas. Your post......." I had to comment here. This story is very interesting, as I have been wondering of late as to why Sec. Rumsfield is now saying that it is possible we will never capture or kill him. Why all of a sudden are they trying to get the American people used to this idea, when in fact we accomplish nothing without killing him. Furthermore, it is also my opinion, we must capture or kill ( preferably kill ) all al queida members and for that matter the taliban. We can not do what was done in Iraq, when we left without killing saddam hussein."..... IMHO. I have been wondering how the USA would handle the bin laden thing, if they kill him and show the body the world of islam will have a martyr and his trained killers will have a reason to fight on. If they capture him for trail there may be even more killing until he is released. But if he is never found and still the taliban get wiped out and bin laden's killers get wiped out and terrorist around the world continue to disappear then his followers will just be waiting around for further orders for the next hundred or so years. Might be a good plan. Lorne

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next