SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 236.73-6.1%Jan 30 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: wanna_bmw who wrote (60303)10/25/2001 5:33:12 PM
From: rsi_boyRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
That's the other reason they did the switch, to justify crippling of the Pentium 3 with a 100mhz bus.

What I said was: compare them both on pc 133, not pc100 and pc1133

The benchmarks you sent me here: xbitlabs.com

Show Celeron 1.2 destroying p4 1.5 in business Winstone and content creation Winstone (48 to 38 points and 56 to 48 respectively) when the Celeron is running 133 bus. It doesn't win in all certainly (in the notorious sysmark2001 the p4 is still ahead) but it wins in most and sometimes by substantial margins

The reasons for this are clear, in some of the applications PC 133 bounds each processor equivalently. In the CPU bound apps, the superior IPC of the P6 core wins out except in the case of the few applications so far that have been painstakingly optimized for the P4.

cheers,
t.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext