SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: BirdDog who wrote (3965)10/27/2001 2:14:10 AM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
BirdDog,

Re: . All those pius Islamic fundamentalists wouldn't hurt a flea...all they ever do is flourish in wonderfull inventions to help mankind...until we stop them...bad us...we're so bad...

I gotta admit. You might be on to something:
nytimes.com

<Snip> U.S. Planes Bomb a Red Cross Site for Second Time
By ELIZABETH BECKER and ERIC SCHMITT

For the second time in 10 days, the Pentagon admitted bombing a Red Cross complex storing humanitarian supplies in Kabul.

WASHINGTON, Oct. 26 — American warplanes bombed and largely destroyed the same Red Cross complex in Kabul that they struck 10 days ago, an error the Pentagon admitted tonight, saying it occurred because military planners had picked the wrong target.


<End Snip>

Say, isn't this the same military that was showing us the extreme accuracy of precision bombing in the Gulf War? (Of course that was later proven to be a lie, but what the heck.)

Could it be that we're trying to starve these damn Afghans? Wuddya think? Is this a kuhl way to fight a war, or what? First we say we won't allow any world court to indict any
American soldiers, then we start on a course of genocide. Neat, huh?

Re: Oh yes.... The US really missed out on the tremendous oil reserves in Vietnam and North Korea.
But not for lack of trying, sir. I have a friend who was a legal secretary in San Francisco and she typed up the contract between Standard Oil of California and the French Consulate, representing the interests of the French Government concerning concessions for tracts off Haiphong harbor. This occurred in 1964. If you are conversant with the geo-political situation at the time, you are aware that this was North Vietnamese sovereign territory and that the French had been chased out of their colonial position after the Battle of Dienbiennphu in 1954
dienbienphu.org
Was there any legitimacy whatsoever to Chevron's claims? Hardly. What does it matter, eh, it became a moot point by the 1970's. And in the end, test wells in the region have recently proved that one of the linchpin reasons for our invasion of Viet Nam was for a futile effort at securing an illusory resource. Such is the game of American hegemon that we love to play.

Salaams, Ray
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext