SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 452.83-1.5%1:51 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dybdahl who wrote (62285)10/28/2001 6:37:27 PM
From: rudedog  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
Lars - You are making this much harder than it is. I have a DSL "modem" supplied by the provider. It has one RJ45 ethernet jack. I could, if I wanted, hook that directly to a switch and the provider's DHCP service would give me as many addresses as I need, each of which would be a unique and publicly available address.

Instead, I hooked that line to a PC running XP. The XP machine has 2 NICs - one on the DSL line and the other going out to my home network. It acts as a NAT and DHCP server, providing downstream addresses in the 192.168.1.xx series.

A friend who also has the same DSL provider has a similar hookup. So he is also working from a machine which has a NAT translation. When I go to connect an instant messaging session, I simply click on his name and the next thing I know, we are on simultaneous video and audio with file sharing. I did nothing to set this up aside from saying "enable internet sharing" when I set up the XP box on the DSL line.

It works fine, you should try it. Although I may not know how the address translation and linkage works, the proof is in the pudding.

As far as patents and such, I am only using what came in the box. Give me a break...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext