Writing on the Wall, written from Bloodshed & Bloodbath
Does this blood come from the messenger,
the one sending the message, innocents
and others not caring and not wanting to know?
Yes
The conflicts of today have many names for descriptors,
and as we all know, depends where you beliefs originate
telling you the order of things to be.
Rather than identify the composition of these fights
using people places things beliefs etc, focus on the wall,
determine the makeup of the blood only, not the message.
The Wall here is not a place specific to any side in
the conflicts, but that which becomes recent history
from current and most recent events.
Only one Wall, all sides in the conflict write to it,
using what flows from the bloodshed of any person
or the bloodbath of many.
Sorrow hurt pain tears grief are not written on the Wall,
they are the Wall.
The Wall of goodness and hope is spoken of, but in vain,
as those who talk to this wall have not the instruments
to write to this Wall, or whatever is written to this Wall,
the message is washed away with tears & blood associated
with the other Wall.
Whoses blood is on that Wall is everyones since only
one Wall exist for all. Lets say that everyside has
the same amount of blood there, and it has been that way
throughtout the long history of planet Earth, as during
periods of times or cycles in events, the blood will flow
more so from one side that those on the other side in conflicts.
But at any given moment in time the total amount of blood
on this Wall has equal amounts from all sides in conflicts
as its an accumulative method for the Writing on the Wall.
The Wall is like a world with a single ocean
that receives the blood of each and every conflict,
forever being added to, and increasing in size.
Unchecked the ocean may increase in volume and flood
that which mankind lives on and erase life itself.
Interconnected questions can be asked.
1. Will each side in conflicts always make additions
to this ocean of blood so that its level will always
rise and threaten to flood where mankind lives?
Yes each side will always make "contributions,"
but there has been a change in degree and make-up.
Because of the 9/11 event, a change has been incorporated
that will cause the make-up in this ocean to reflect that
certain sides will increase their flow, and the other side
in the conflict will decrease their flow. Following this
the reverse will occur and signal a trend that the total
amount of blood flow into this single ocean on the planet,
called the Writing on the Wall, will decrease to a near stop.
The USA War on Terrorism has not yet begun, but only that
prelude to what exist and has existed since World War II,
knowned and not deal with to the degree of ignoring it.
It will be deal with, and those nations with the most
and strongest military, coupled with intelligence gathering,
will rule the day and weeks and months ahead of us.
Need a timeline is easy to give using the 9/11 event.
Prior to 9/11 conflicts were like a stalemate condition
that had no winners, but many losers.
After 9/11 terrorism now has a half-life of one year.
The USA has declared war on terrorism and has touched it
and received the deadly radiation at full strength.
year.... terrorism_strength
2001.... 100
2002.... 50
2003.... 25
2004.... 12
2005.... 6
2006.... 3
2007.... 1
2008.... ?
The second interconnected questions can now be asked.
2. Will terrorism ever be erased completely,
as in example above year 2008+ using condition
that its close to zero and remains near zero?
Answer: Yes, but only if the war on terrorism is never declared
by the nations as being won, but only being held in check.
Just as that saying says
"The rich get richer and the poor get poorer."
my speculation is that those with military might will rule,
but only after they take a big hit, causing them to rule,
not by right, but by might.
dougak |
