Elmer Re...Business Week has the same right to be wrong as you have. <<<<<<
So, you aren't going to provide a link. I have another from your own Intellabee group. Wanna
Bill, Re: "Without AMD Intel would have kept prices a lot higher and had a far better ASP." No, Bill. The downturn in the economy has forced Intel to lower prices to maintain processor demand. If AMD didn't exist, Intel would have still lowered prices in this situation. With AMD, Intel probably lowered their prices more than they would have otherwise, but AMD is not the major contributor to the price cuts. You just wish they were.<<<<<<<<
Even wanna admits Intel started the price war. So now I have business week, Wanna, and most of the AMD posters. Plus I think I have Tench wobbling on the fence. Who do you have, besides yourself?
Show me one time where Intel sold processors cheaper than AMD.<<<<<<<
I believe afger Intel dropped their prices today, all of Intels P4 are cheaper than a comparable XP, as we speak. Also, it seems to me, when AThlon introed the 1 ghz, Intel introed theirs 2 days later and had it priced cheaper; except it wasn't in stock.
And AMD's price doesn't include those costs? What can I do with reasoning(?) like this?<<<
Amd doesn't AFAIK pay a percentage of other peoples adds. Intel also AFAIK offers engineering services to Dell and other OEMs. And Intel has the name brand; are you arguing with that? |