SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 487.96+0.2%12:13 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: rudedog who wrote (62366)10/31/2001 5:16:41 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
But any serious work with video or big format photos, for example, is very sluggish on wireless

Of course -- but these are also very sluggish on a local HD -- even if you're running fast SCSI, as I am, large files take time.

802.11b is in its infancy, and at 11mbps you can fill up the pipe in a hurry. We spend a great deal of time today dealing with cabling issues for our customer installations -- all using 100mbps networks. Five years from now, I fully expect (& hope) to be able to do 100mpbs over wireless.

Other than A/V, there is very little within a household that would demand 10 or 11 mpbs, let alone 100 or Gigabit. The point is, a few years ago, we talked about Cat 5 hardwiring for 10mbps; today, Cat 5 hardwiring can do Gigabit. In the forseeable future we may well see wireless Gigabit (I have no idea how, but I'd bet someone will find a way to do it...)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext