Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 36.15

-0.6%

Dec 24 12:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Paul Engel who wrote (146584)	11/1/2001 1:18:27 AM
From: Eric K.	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Re: Erik the Klown... You think Intel's cost of production was HIGHER than $72 ? Well, Blow-Daddy, sales, marketing, and other non-fab-related things go into the "cost to release" a cpu, don't they? Including them (as you have done to come up with AMD's $72 cost per cpu), Intel definitely spent more than $72 per cpu. If you assume that AMD and Intel spend a similar relative amount outside the fabs [I'll have to check the 10qs to see if this is a valid assumption], each Intel cpu costs a little bit more to physically produce than does each AMD cpu. -Eric

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next