ahhaha's ahs Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: ahhaha who wrote (3352)	11/1/2001 11:11:31 AM
From: Mark Adams	Read Replies (2) of 24758

Corporations don't have the incentive to the extent that individuals do. Why should corporate management take risks with tax liability? What consequence does that have on each of them personally? Certainly not what cooking their own personal 1040s do. It is rare that any management attempts shenanigans First, I maintain that the bulk of corporate activity is not public held entities, but private. Where management and ownership interests are one and the same. Defined as number of corporations, total corporate revenue, and corporate income taxes paid. Second, I think you err in the assertion that structuring activity to minimize tax is illegal, immoral etc. You consistently assert that there is no difference between avoiding and evading tax liability. >>Tax policy is structured to create incentives by policy makers. If you believe this, then why would you assert that corporations receive better treatment? Because corporate entities exert a greater influence on the legislature process. And the bulk of these corporate entities are in fact proxies for private individuals and groups.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next