PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TigerPaw who wrote (198600)	11/1/2001 3:15:29 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) of 769667

TP since you still seem to believe the SC elected GWB I would like to point out where I think the dems got off track with their zeal for the presidency and see what your position is on it. Not trying to be smart alleckey or anything, but this is where I think they went over the edge. 1) The election was within the range where it needed to be re-counted (within 1/2% I think). Everyone agrees. 2) An automatic recount was done based on the situation above, and GWB was still ahead. Everyone agrees. That is where I thought it would (and should) end. Then there was a condition brought up by the dems that required hand counting of certain districts. I understand the law to have been that this was only required if there was a machine malfunction or fraud, and there was neither. What is the dem postion on this? What specifically gave them the "right" to go further? Many on the left have said that minds can't be changed, etc. Maybe mine can. What gave the dems legal precedent to go furhter? My view is that the SC had to act to prevent the FL SC from CHANGING the rules after the election at this juncture and jeopardizing the integrity of the process.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next