SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Ask da_cheif
MVIS 0.915+0.6%Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: moorso who wrote (6688)11/1/2001 9:05:17 PM
From: Vitas  Read Replies (2) of 8150
 
moorso,here's the post you responded to below

it refers specifically to the August decline (into September). So do my posts numbered #6629, #6641, #6657 and #6675.

I did not claim to have a better system. I posted an example of one that did not appear to have a drawdown of 17%. Your premise for a contest fails. Besides, I trade solely stocks, not indices.

Come out of denial and answer the question - why did the CLX system fail during the August-September decline

------------------------------------------

To:Chip McVickar who wrote (6676)
From: Vitas Thursday, Nov 1, 2001 5:21 PM
View Replies (1) | Respond to of 6702

Chip, given the poor performance of the CLX-CLXPP-AYDIS system during the decline in August do you have any ideas as to what failed - why was it giving false positive readings?

Is it a matter of re-interpreting the figures in a different manner, using filters of some sort, targeting stocks that had minimal net changes for the day because of decimalization, dividing the Dow stocks into larger cap versus smaller cap issues and making a comparison, whatever.

I, for one, would like to see the regular posters on this thread address the issue - how do you try to avoid major drawdowns in the future.

Vitas
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext