SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 213.43+6.2%Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: wanna_bmw who wrote (61664)11/2/2001 1:27:26 AM
From: Joe NYCRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
wbmw,

You must be confused again. From Anand's article, the 1GHz Pentium III whooped the Athlon in everything but OpenGL.

Piii was a very good chip, but I disagree with that description, a better description would be that Piii was slightly faster in integer type apps, Athlon was faster in floating point based at the same frequency.

That's the major flaw in your analysis, because Piii was constantly some 100 MHz or more behind Athlon, allowing Athlon to rule the benchmarks.

The review you posted was done on March 12th, about 6 months before the 1 GHz Coppermine entered general availability (end of August, beginning of September 2000).

Another flaw in your analysis is the fact that the real 1 GHz Piii (when it finally became available) competed against Thunderbird, not Athlon classic, which the vapor based Piii competed with. And Thunderbird was at 1.1 and 1.2 GHz at the time Piii became available. You may want to check out these benchmarks: anandtech.com

Joe
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext