Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)

AMD 214.99

0.0%

Dec 26 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: combjelly who wrote (61987)	11/3/2001 9:46:03 AM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (4) of 275872

Combjelly, re: To hold that the speed of the processor is the only acceptable metric is attempting to re-write history, the industry has rejected that in the past, and there is no reason to change it. I never said that. But to create a unilateral benchmark that mimics MHz numbers has nothing to do with reality. Even you have to admit that Model Hurtz clouds the MHz perception even more. Why not give the consumer real system performance numbers, as I suggested in this post more than a month ago (last paragraph): Message 16454501 Of course if you rate the complete system performance, that takes the brand equity away from the microprocessor manufacturer, and transfers it to the OEM. Probably a bad thing for Intel, maybe a good thing for AMD. re: But to argue that the concept itself is "intentionally deceptive" is either ignorant, stupid or deceptive itself. Boy, for a moderated thread, you AMD guys sure throw around insults. I'm either "ignorant, stupid or deceptive". With that pleasant thought in mind, I'll end this side of the argument, confident that you will be banned from the thread. Have a good weekend. John

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next