SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor
GDXJ 90.35+0.4%Nov 6 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: d:oug who wrote (79107)11/4/2001 7:47:05 AM
From: Richnorth  Read Replies (3) of 116753
 
The discussion on pork started with suggestions that forcing terrorist prisoners to eat pork might make them to "sing" or rat on their organization's plans and on other terrorists still at large.

Also, it was thought that dropping bombs smeared with pork products or air-dropping planeloads of pigs on the Taliban and its supporters might help to end the war quickly.

The rationale seems to be that as pigs and pork are taboo in Islam, any physical contact with them constitutes such a serious contamination and offence that it precludes a Muslim from entering Paradise and enjoying his 70 dark-eyed virgins! And so it is presumed that the use of pigs/pork would deter many a Muslim from fighting in the war. (That is, why fight and die when Paradise and lovely women will not become rewards in the hereafter because of the inevitable contamination with pigs/pork in the war or Mission against the West?)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext