Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LLLefty who wrote (9013)	11/5/2001 1:53:40 PM
From: E	Read Replies (2) of 281500

I found some discussion of the 'case' for the arrest. I don't find it impressive, and think lies and distortions will fly so thick and fast we won't be sure for a while why she didn't make that conference. politechbot.com You mention the title of the act, "U.S.A Patriotic Act." This is why I think it is unsettling and revealing: The combating of terrorism is not about "patriotism," it is about safety and security. The suppression of dissent, however, is invariably called by that name, just as dissenters are invariably called unpatriotic. On SI, an un-terrorist dissenter was recently called a traitor. If legislation gives an establishment the right to suppress dissent for its own political purposes, it will define its own political purposes so as to allow it to muzzle its critics. That is the way it works. Unless one has a functioning Bill of Rights to minimize the Power Corrupts effect.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next