SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (23349)11/5/2001 6:54:13 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (3) of 52237
 
Haim,

Do you really belief this urban legend about Fonda's treachery? If so, I go a bridge I'd like to sell you.

Ms. Fonda wasn't fighting America's soldiers, she was fighting a hubristic, arrogant and wrong-headed elite in Washington that was leading our great nation into an awful, unnecessary mess.

Instead of wasting time reading trashy Yahoo posts, perhaps time would be better spent reading what real military historians have to say about our involvement in Viet Nam:

Dereliction of Duty : Johnson, McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Lies That Led to Vietnam
by H. R. McMaster

amazon.com

Mr. McMaster is a military man, here's the blurb:

For years the popular myth surrounding the Vietnam War was that the Joint Chiefs of Staff knew what it would take to win but were consistently thwarted or ignored by the politicians in power. Now H. R. McMaster shatters this and other misconceptions about the military and Vietnam in Dereliction of Duty. Himself a West Point graduate, McMaster painstakingly waded through every memo and report concerning Vietnam from every meeting of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to build a comprehensive picture of a house divided against itself: a president and his coterie of advisors obsessed with keeping Vietnam from becoming a political issue versus the Joint Chiefs themselves, mired in interservice rivalries and unable to reach any unified goals or conclusions about the country's conduct in the war.
McMaster stresses two elements in his discussion of America's failure in Vietnam: the hubris of Johnson and his advisors and the weakness of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Dereliction of Duty provides both a thorough exploration of the military's role in determining Vietnam policy and a telling portrait of the men most responsible. --


So, instead of portraying Jane Fonda as traitor, perhaps it would be more correct to label Robert McNamara as such. He's someone that David Halberstam on C-SPAN yesterday labeled "the biggest lying son-of-a-bitch this government has ever produced".

Jane Fonda went to North Viet Nam to save lives. McNamara and his ilk are responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of American soldiers and millions of Vietnamese killed after he made the assessment, admitted to in his book, that he felt in 1963 that the war was unwinnable. Who's the traitor to his country?

Sincerely, RGD
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext