SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 203.14-0.8%Jan 9 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: combjelly who wrote (62544)11/7/2001 11:13:25 AM
From: wanna_bmwRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
Combjelly, Re: "Here is a cost analysis I found. See slide 22. Note: since they make the distinction between costs and selling price"

They mislabeled the graph. Those are selling prices, not costs. Just look at Intel's price list, under the older, "October '01" prices.

intc.com

If those were costs on the previous page, that would imply 0% margin on all of Intel's processors, which we know is not true. Additionally, a 2.0GHz Pentium 4 should cost no more than a 1.9GHz Pentium 4. They are all just different binned speed grades, determined during the sort process, and they all come from the same cost wafers through the same cost manufacturing.

I'm guessing that a 2.0GHz Pentium 4, just like a 1.5GHz Pentium 4, probably costs less than $100 fully packaged and boxed. A single Itanium CPU, with OEM bulk packaging, probably costs in the neighborhood of $200. But even if I am off by a factor of 2x (which I don't think I am), that still makes every Itanium sale almost 90% profit.

wanna_bmw
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext