VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: J. C. Dithers who wrote (44079)	11/8/2001 10:08:44 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) of 65232

HI JC, I am in contact with Scott. It seems Scott did not know SI's definition of spam & that is why he got the boot the second time around. It seems that Scott applied a generally accepted definition of spam which does not include posting the same information on three separate threads even though that information is relevant on each of these threads. IMO, there is clearly a communication problem that allowed the second suspension to occur. Like I said, it seems it is easy to take harsh unilateral action against well meaning individuals than it is to take appropriate action against those who are intentionally disruptive but highly vocal in defending their atrocious actions.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next