SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: E. T. who wrote (201270)11/8/2001 2:20:30 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) of 769668
 
e.t. I use the words appropriate to describe clearly what I see. I also don't think there are any children in an age sense posting on this thread. I point out flaws of logic that to me show a person does not have a clue. The word stupid is shorthand for clueless. If the person just cannot see and continues with bogus logic then there in some form of retardation. And those who lie and go into sexual racial, religious and other personal ridicule I consider contemptible. But telling a person they are thinking stupidly is not ridicule.

Have I ever called you contemptible??? I don't recall if I ever called you retarded. And yes many of your post show a clueless understanding of associative logic and that is at the base of your dumb view of the world. You are a relative newcomer on this thread and the "stupid," contemptible,""retarded." posts of those I used the term on are well deserved.

Stupid is a good word that clearly describes many things that people do. But when I deal with folks in person I make sure they see the difference in my description of doing something that is stupid and who the person is. I have coached and skippered a Sea Scout Ship and young folks love honesty and are not fragile. They find PC bullcrap stupid. They are smart enough to know the difference between love and put down.

Now as to mr. bill and his rape. When I see the lefty loon crowd go on and on with the poor logic the assumption that someone is corrupt, I go the the ultimate corruption that is fact and was and is glossed over. Any person who review the proof in this case can only conclude on thing. Any person who concludes that and would still wish that person to be a public person and continue to rape a poor woman over and over by his appearance is very sick in their heart. A stupid person will never see and think about what it is that is said in the first place. They get upset and do all kinds of dodge talk and never stop and think and consider.

I do not patronize folks. If they are saying the stupid I tell them what I honestly feel. That is being civil. Patronizing a person is insulting. You can go to my hundreds of web pages and ask yourself, What does it take in understanding to do this. Well if a person has the ability to do something and he has taken the time to speak, what has he said and why has he said it and is there some truth in what he has said. Or one can just get upset and instead of asking why, ramble on and on.

tom watson tosiwmee
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News