Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 35.81

+0.2%

Nov 25 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: fingolfen who wrote (147238)	11/9/2001 12:15:31 PM
From: semiconeng	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Oh great and wise Dan who has never set foot in a fab, please educate us poor Ph.D's. Bottom line is that Intel has 2.0GHz on a 100nm gate, and have demonstrated 3.0 to 3.5 on a nominally 65-70nm gate whereas AMD is stuck at 1.6GHz on a 70nm gate. Your assertion is just plain wrong. If you have some data, present it. Otherwise be an adult, admit your error, and move on with life. HAW HAW HAW...... I almost responded in kind to Dan about that ridiculous "More Than 1 Dimension" statement. Was that a riot OR WHAT???? AS IF Channel Length was just some 1 minor dimension of many. Clearly Dan has no idea of the relationships, or importance of Channel Length vs. Current Leakage vs. Chip Speed....... Oh Man....... "There is more that 1 dimension to a gate", HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA..... WHEW!!!!! THAT WAS A GOOD ONE. :-) Semi

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next