SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 209.34+0.1%9:38 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: fyodor_ who wrote (63205)11/11/2001 1:47:09 PM
From: Joe NYCRead Replies (2) of 275872
 
Fyo,

It should be noted that the Parallel port isn't much better. [than USB]

That pretty much sums it up. USB came into existance perhaps 10 years or later in order to replace obsolete Parallel and Serial ports, and it turned out to be barely superior to a stone age technology, and inferior in reliability. I recall an article about callers to technical support of a printer manufacturer being urged to forget USB and connect through the parallel port.

Have you ever tried chaining e.g. a scanner and a printer to a single parallel port?

I did not know this was possible. I don't know if this was part of the original specs.

I used in the past external SCSI scanner and Zip drive, which was not very reliable either. I hope USB 2.0 or Firewire will prove to be more reliable.

Joe
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext