SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: slacker711 who wrote (4299)11/11/2001 11:56:11 PM
From: axial  Read Replies (1) of 46821
 
Hi, Slacker - " They should have enough spectrum to accomdate increased penetration and usage that approach wireline rates, without coming close to taxing their system capacity. "

Which brings us back to Peter's point - "3G is a 'brand' for getting new spectrum from regulators, not a more efficient use of existing spectrum."
____________________________________

You're probably right to question the point at which capacity will be exceeded. Traffic is dispersed in geography and time.

A measurement of traffic on our highways would probably determine that they are under-used. But that's little comfort to the person stuck in rush-hour traffic.

"Unforuntately, I dont think that there is enough hard data yet to figure out how much spectrum will be needed for wireless data services."

Agreed - and I don't think that anyone has figured out what those services will be. Nokia and Ericsson have been researching 3G apps for a long time.

Assumptions about growth and demographics are iffy; if the scenario I'm proposing is wrong, then what motivation would there be for capacity increases, by modulation changes, or otherwise? None, that I can see.

It all becomes the pipe dreams of engineers. Is that what you're saying?

Regards,

Jim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext