These five "definitions" do not respond to the puzzling fact that being absolute (+almighty?) is not "feasible as per my example. It still comes down not to "evidence" but to faith. If you look at the planet earth, these four definitions apply to it as well (at least within the realm of human grasp), those thus make it "god", the same applies to the "sun", the moon and many other idolatrous deities of the past.
I could write:
Say: He is the Sun, the One and Only: (correct by definition, or "axiomatic")
Sun, the Eternal, Absolute (correct within the space of homo sapiens species span on "eternal", and absolute, within the limitations of my prior post.)
He Begetteth not, nor is He begotten (correct by definition for the Sun, but Christianity would quarrel with that as a godly prerequisite)
And there is none like onto him (really a repetition of 1 above, and applies as well to the Sun.)
Conclusion, the Sun is God, and here we are back 4000 years in the annals of humanity worshiping the sun, and obsequious, as ever to the powers of nature..
Zeev |
