Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 37.44

-0.2%

10:12 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Charles Gryba who wrote (148057)	11/14/2001 11:40:07 AM
From: fingolfen	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Elmer, you guys are masters of digressing. The original conversation was about the need for copper and the aluminum 2Ghz .18 P4 was brought up as evidence for not needing copper in .18. I brought up the 1Ghz Aluminum P3 to illustrate the limitations of Aluminum. If you want to argue about apples and oranges, go ahead. Constantine, You're missing the point. Your thesis is that copper bought speed for AMD. Based on my knowledge of microprocessor fabrication, I think that's just plain wrong. Copper probably bought AMD no more than 50MHz (if that much!), whereas a more recent core design and very narrow polysilicon gates bought them the rest (with the lion's share coming from the gates).

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next