SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Paint The Table

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nemer who wrote (2543)11/17/2001 1:14:15 PM
From: HG  Read Replies (1) of 23786
 
Shootie seemed to refer to a canned version of ozone. I wondered if it really was true and could be done, or if it was wishful thinking....I suppose under zero or close to zero pressure of a can, it could be done, but then it would break down as soon as it encountered the normal atmosphere....?

Also, is ozone inert in itself, or does it make other gases inert ? I mean, the equation i presented, (2O3 ==> 3O2) represented the inert nature of ozone in that it does not combine with any other gas, just breaks down into oxygen and ions and the ions further combine to form more oxygen. But if shootie's statement is true, that its ions react with other gases, then ozone itself would not be deemed to be inert, would it ? A single atom of oxygen is a very dangerous element - it can virtually combine with anything in our atmoshere, but perhaps it always needs a catalyst ? My assumption was that of its own free will, it doesn't combine with anything at all....2 of those those O's just lump together to produce more Oxygen....

But I really hated inorganic chemistry in school, and really did get a "D" in it, so this is just loud thinking...

And as for the homemade generator, who will I sue if it doesn't work well ??? LOL
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext