SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 270.13-1.8%Dec 11 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ratan lal who wrote (55805)11/18/2001 3:58:11 PM
From: Jacob Snyder  Read Replies (1) of 70976
 
No, because I am more disciplined than that. My plan only works if I stick to the plan and don't let myself be influenced by the waves of alternating panic buying and panic selling. If I do, then, you're right, my wealth goes off to Money Heaven. The plan: If the Nas goes from 2000 to 3000 (or 4000 or whatever), I stay at 40% cash. Notice, I'm still getting richer, as my long positions (60%) go up, and I steadily sell them in increments, to maintain a 40% cash level. And a lot of my long positions are LEAPs, now in-the-money, so they go up by a larger % than the market does. Yes, I give up a lot of the upside (more and more, the more the Bubble reinflates), but I don't like the risk/reward of being 100% long the market, given current macro conditions and valuations. And the more the market goes up, the more cautious I get, because I recognize that the risk/reward balance is tilting steadily against me. And I don't start using margin, until/if the market is retesting the September lows. 40% margin only happens at Nas 1000.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext