SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (37189)11/19/2001 1:31:22 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 82486
 
But why is the mother's life more valuable than the child's?

Did I say it was? Did I make any statement about the relative value of the lives of the people involved?

And why should "this country" matter? I thought we were dealing with universal moral questions here.

I would say that we are dealing both with more general moral questions and a political issue. When the moral question is more clear cut (intentionally killing an innocent person or refraing from killing an innocent) then I would be more willing to have the state intervene. When the moral question becomes more complex (making one person die to avoid causing the death of another) and the proposed intervention (outlawing abortion even when the mother's life is in danger without one) is more extreme and unpopular (a strong minority is pro-life, but almost no one would support the idea that abortion should be illegal even to save the life of the mother), then I am less likely to support the intervention. You could say that the the proposed state intervention has to meet a much higher standard in that situation. In that situation you are not saving a life without destroying another, and you are imposing the solution against the will of 99+% of the population.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext