The Book Of Anglion: Condensed Version (3)
by J. Dean Fagerstrom
(16) We have what is called the NA, (numerical age). This means that at any given point in time a person's age can be graphically stated in the most exact terms, in other words the number of days one has lived since date of birth. On 29 March 1772 Swedenborg passed into the spiritual world, his NA being 30741. He was born on 29 January 1688. This NA of 30741 therefore depicts the precise number of days between the two dates. Anglion is the name of an angelic society whose major function is to reveal numerical correspondence as a means of communicating spiritual truth in an analog/digital manner. One could even say that Anglion is a heavenly mainframe computer system, more of which will be demonstrated in later pages. 38 times Swedenborg's NA of 30741 is 1168158. To this number is added the NC (numerical correspondence) of the Divine name, Jesus Christ, or 405043. And to these numbers is added the NC of the title God, or 764. The sum now shows 1573965, the NC of the name Anglion.
(17) Of supreme importance mathematically is the authentic Divine date of birth, the day Jesus Christ was incarnated in flesh. This supreme date of all history was 11 August Year 1. Many other things will be said concerning this, but first a word about the mathematical impact this date has on all other numbers. Conventional religious historians refer to B.C. time as though this term had any meaning. What this date signifies is beyond calculation as one will see. We have carefully and repetitively counted the exact number of solar days elapsed between 11 August Year 1 and many other dates of more current time, my own date of birth being one. In so-called B.C. time there are 2334 unaccounted-for days since 11 August Year 1 and leading up the time scale to 0 year, the equatorial dividing line between B.C. time and A.D time shows this many days. This is why modern chronologists and the various calendar changes throughout the years make an incorrect conclusion about the present year-date. This will be explained at a later time. We have also what is termed the UND (universal numerical date). From 11 August Year 1 until my date of birth -7 February 1932-there are exactly 707669 days. This is my UND-B, the addendum 'B' meaning birth. The date of birth just given, my own in this case, is called the provincial date since it is actually uncorrected in terms of what my UND-B states. The eight-digit date of year-month-day is always written as 19320207, again using my own example. The year is the larger component, the month the next larger and of course the day the smallest. This manner of stating a date also belongs to what we will call the Anglion context. At the very beginning of my studies and research immediately after the Aphax encounter, Maxine told me about the proper method of writing eight-digit dates as well as hundreds of other things.
(18) The method of correcting a date can only be done by knowing the UND-B, either that of a person or any UND of some historical event. The factor used is the solar-year-factor, 365.25, since this is the rotational period of the earth around the sun. This factor is the actual mathematical representation of the solar year, and while certain calculations may differ fractionally the differential does not affect the outcome of what is to be presented. We therefore divide the SYF (solar-year-factor) 365.25 into 707669 and the corrected year-date shows 1937, an obvious compensation for the 2334 days in so-called B.C. time as explained above. This does not make anyone younger; it only serves to digitize the eight-digit date of birth or whatever other event is involved.
(19) Another highly useful factor in knowing one's UND-B is that of determining the differential between such a date and another person's date of birth. For example the UND-B of Swedenborg, who is considered my mentor, is 618539. The differential with 707669 is 89130, but the conjunctive PN is 2971 (x30). This means that if I program 2971 on a calculator or other means this number added 30 times to Swedenborg's UND-B, 618539, will eventuate in showing my own UND-B, 707669. The conjunctive PN will be seen as a very significant factor later in the text.
(20) Still another term is shown, the ND (numerical designator). The ND acts as a kind of mathematical genetic code, or fingerprint, identifying a person with infallible precision as it is used in relationship to a numerical context.
(21) I use my own example of how one should locate one's ND. There are three NDs, the natural, the spiritual and the celestial versions. The first step is to write the natural date of birth, in the example: 19320207. We are born on a day in precise terms, therefore the 7 is placed on paper. Next we add the month, 02, and finally the year. But in determining an ND we are not looking for numbers (plural) but for three numerals (singular), which, placed together reveal the raw number. Thus far we have 7 and 2. To locate the year portion we add 1 + 9 + 3 +2=15. This result is still a number, not a numeral, so 1+5=6. We now have the raw number of my natural ND, 726. This number is factored to its PN by 66 and reveals 11 as the prime number, PN.
(22) The next ND, the spiritual version, is determined by using the corrected date involved, in my case 19370207. Using the same method as above we find that 722 is the spiritual ND. This, too, must be factored to its PN and shows 19 (x38). The third version is called the celestial because of the Divine conception date which occurred in Year 1 minus 1, or in common terminology 7 B.C. on 8 November. Because of this most sacred date we remain with the corrected year-date, again in my own example: 19371108. This means one will substitute 8 November in place of one's day and month designations. Seen now my celestial ND reveals 822 based on the method demonstrated above. 822 must also be factored, and shows 137 (x6). The final computation now shows 11 plus 19 plus 137, or what we term the cumulative ND: 167. If one's final cumulative ND is not a PN it is left as it occurs since each of the elements are already PNs and any further factoring would only confound the mathematics involved in subsequent applications.
(23) What has been shown thus far is only a fundamental process involving the analog, the digital and the prime number function. These three processes must always be present in the proper manner when presenting numerical correspondence from the Anglion context.
>>more>>. |
