SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound
REFR 1.380-2.1%Dec 24 12:52 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ben Wa who wrote (8406)11/21/2001 1:58:40 PM
From: RockyBalboa  Read Replies (1) of 10293
 
msnbc.com

DOES THE TECHNOLOGY WORK?
What’s more, there is the unsettling question of whether InVision’s luggage screening technology, which basically boils down to CAT-scanners for suitcases, can reliably detect explosives in luggage. In 1998 the FAA pronounced the company’s machines “virtually foolproof.” But a test of the equipment at San Francisco International Airport by United Airlines found that the devices set off false alarms 30 percent of the time, and actually mistook sneakers and sausages for explosives.

Problems with the equipment persisted as recently as last November. In a test conducted by the New York Port Authority at JFK International Airport, pieces of luggage laden with C-4 explosives had to be run through the InVision scanners four times before they actually set off any alarms.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext