SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rich1 who wrote (7498)11/22/2001 11:02:16 AM
From: ajtj99  Read Replies (2) of 99280
 
Rich, when looking at things, you have to respect recent history.

-To kill a bear, you have to re-test the lows. We haven't done that

-The peaks in January and May broke through the falling resistance line for between 75-150 points and fell back below. We broke through a bit better than that.

-Historically, large drops happen when the RSI is as high as it has been this week.

-We have rallied nearly as far as we did in the Spring, and that turned back after the peak.

-Rising wedges have formed on most indices, and those normally break to the norm (down) to the point at which they started. They are quite bearish formations that need to be respected.

-MM's are criminal

There are many other reasons, but we've been over them here many times.

-E-wavers look at waves, not history. If we don't learn from recent history (May, June, August as well as summer 2000) we are doomed to repeat it. Double tops, re-tests, falling resistance lines, support/resistance lines, wedges, and necessary pullbacks don't really seem to matter to many e-wavers from what I can see. The main focus tends to be Fib re-traces and waves, which is a bit too simplistic for me.

They may be right, Rich, but I just see way too much stacked against their case.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext