I offered that explanation several times,Neocon, and four days before you thought of it.
It is, of course, even as a rationalization, scurrilous.
But even more scurrilous is making a dastardly, name-blackening accusation about a person whom you have just with "mentions" of litigation (CH seems to be uncommonly litigious! -- yet he doesn't call what he did regarding Poet threats to "sue" over her), gotten the right to post to-and-about against her will, and then refusing to substantiate them, but instead repeating and repeating the calumny, and, when asked to substantiate it pleading... nolo contendere.
It is base. It disgusts me so profoundly I can not tell you. I continue to hope CH will tell us the basis of his oft-reiterated accusation against Poet.
And if he admits it was what you and I speculated, that he will state whether I, also, have caste aspersions on our troops.
That would be an interesting discussion. |
