gem-x's incredibly accurate Elliott Wave forecasts. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : gem-x's incredibly accurate Elliott Wave forecasts.

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: gem-x who started this subject	11/23/2001 9:52:03 PM
From: gem-x	Read Replies (1) of 2290

Side note about Hocheberg: The man said in a recent interview (I was reading a magazine at Border's..forgot the name of it) that the first time he read "Elliott Wave Principle" by Frost and Prechter, he had absolutely no clue what any of it meant, and after "the seventh or eigth" time things started "clicking". And that's it "started clicking", which to me means "I kinda get it, got a few things out of it, but I'm gonna do my own thing now". Which he's done. What I don't understand and confuses me about these dudes who appear in magazines is that they haven't even made the comparison between DOW 1929-1937 and NASDAQ 2000-2001, and their zigzags how incredibly similiar they are. Or even bothered to get into describing corrective waves, and in the magazine threw up his lazy 5 wave count down on the NASDAQ. And not once talked about describing the complexities of the huge variety of corrective waves. In learning the Elliott Wave, the most important waves to learn are the corrective waves, but I think he kinda skipped those chapters....and a lot of people I see flashing their faces in magazines skipped them too..

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next