Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lee Lichterman III who wrote (24695)	11/24/2001 2:02:46 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) of 52237

so let's take it to PM or a political thread if you wish to continue. No problem.. And I completely agree this is not the thread for such a discussion (which I why I felt some freedom to respond here after you "opened the door"). I invite you to come on over to: Subject 51724 The US armed Iraq when we were against Iran in the 70s Since when does the US sell T-72s and AK-47, as well as SA-6 anti-aircraft missiles? The Iranians, at least, were using some remaining US made equipment sold to the Shah, and logistically supplied through Israel (remember Iran-Contra?). Btw, my BA was in Poli Sci, specifically International Affairs and National Security Policy, with focus upon the Middle East and Latin America. And I was taught the essentials of political risk analysis by one of the foremost sino-soviet specialists who used to be the director of the Asia Office of INR at State. A person who Kissinger consulted with about sino-soviet relations after he left State and went to work for Rand. pbs.org What should be drawn from this conversation is that US foreign policy doesn't operate in a vacuum, and is often reactive to events which were not of our making. Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next