Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 37.81

-4.3%

Dec 12 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: milo_morai who wrote (149372)	11/25/2001 8:07:12 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) of 186894

We do know that Hammers IPC is at least 50% faster then Athlon. Also we know it will debut between 2Ghz and 2.5Ghz. I wouldn't be so sure of your predictions, as P4 was supposed to blow Athlon away in IPC and it's 30% slower. Milo, a little refresher... The first P6 was the Pentium Pro @ 150, 166, 180 & 200MHz. PPro performed worse than Pentium on old code. PPro was followed by Klamath. Klamath was followed by Deschutes. Deschutes was followed by Katmai. Katmai was followed by Coppermine. Coppermine was followed by Tualatin.... The PPro FSB was completely re-engineered. It ran at 66MHz and was condemned by the pundits as a bad design intended only to lock AMD out. They couldn't see that it enabled seamless multiprocessing and would scale to (soon) 533MHz and beyond and support Intel's product line from Celeron to top end mainframe class multiprocessor servers. All they could see was junk. Now you've seen Willamette and only Willamette and you think you can draw a conclusion about it's potential. I don't think so... EP

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next