Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jlallen who wrote (38759)	11/26/2001 12:28:17 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) of 82486

Thank you for the explanation. That makes sense. I'm glad you didn't make me beg. <g> He seems to be saying only that he finds the cloning issue more important than the war on terrorism. What if he were saying that he finds removing Condit or winning the Superbowl more important than fighting terrorism? Some might say that conquering racism is more important than fighting terrorism. Or stopping assisted suicide in Oregon. Or getting the Nasdaq back up to where it was. As a matter or public policy, I wouldn't put anything ahead of fighting terrorism right now. I just heard someone say on TV that the Senate was too busy with the war right now and wouldn't get around to a bill on cloning any time soon. I definitely agree with that priority and disagree with Novak's. So my question to you is, how do you determine which issues can legitimately be put ahead of the war on terrorism without being unpatriotic? Karen

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next