AstroTemporal Wave Theory
Nasdaq is predictably having trouble breaching 1929. The stock market experienced some of its worst percentage declines from the years 1929 to 1931 (1929 is also, not coincidentally, the year Hubble postulated the Expansion of the Universe). If Nasdaq can close above 1931, the next logical resistance will be at the 1937 to 1941 area (because those were bad years also). Then it will be clear sailing to 1974ish.
If it breaks 1977, then it will definitely make it to 2000. A Nasdaq break of 2000 is extremely unlikely, because this is the year 2001, and based on the ATW model correlating Nasdaq movement with bad stock market years and obscure astronomical events mostly related to supernovas, we can almost never trade at a Nasdaq level above the current year.
The fact that we traded up to 5200 was an obscenely predictable "Double Golden Mean Surge" (or DoGMeS). That, of course, is twice the normalized golden-mean (1.618 x 2) multiplied by the first sighting of Kepler's Nova (an expanding bubble of hot gas) in 1604. Therefore 1604 x 3.236 = 5,190
For Diagram of Kepler's Nova See lhl.lib.mo.us
For an explanation of Golden Mean, and some other cool picture see: mathsoft.com
If, in the unlikely event, Nasdaq breaks 2001 before next year, this could send us into a second wave golden mean surge. This fairly rare phenomenon would necessarily take the Nasdaq to either the 6429 level (simply a double golden mean surge based on the 1987 sighting of Nova 1987A), or, dare I suggest it we could be swept into the first ever and thus far theoretical Binary Gathered Golden Mean Surge!!! Forgive my childish repetition of exclamation points, but I don't know how else to express my excitement at the prospect of a true BiGDoGMeS! This clearly would push the Nasdaq to 11,620 (The sum of the years of the two most recent significant supernova sightings multiplied by the two times the golden mean . . . or . . . [(1604 + 1987) * 1.618 x 2]. Some experts suggest including Varahamihira's birth year in the calculation (see below, for quick review of Varahamihira), which would suggest a Nasdaq high of 13,254, but I reject that theory as patently absurd, as it flies in the face of any reasonable market theory. One noted "pundit" (whom I'm sure I don't have to name - initials CRT) even recommends SQUARING the normalized golden mean, before applying it as a multiplier. Come now, people! With bowtie-wearing crackpots like him around how can we ever hope to gain the respect our system deserves?
See vicenzanews.it
Also: magicdragon.com
For the few remaining doubting Thomases out there, please explain to me how the timing of Tulipmania (1630s) coincides almost perfectly with the simultaneous sightings of the Crab Supernova by Native American and Chinese astronomers. An almost perfect single golden mean surge! 1630 / 1.618 = 1011. The actual year of the sighting was 1054, but some, including myself, believe that, had the astronomers really been paying close attention, weather permitting, they would have spotted the nova 43 years earlier . . exactly the year 1011!Uncanny!
To further convince and amaze, consider that the Tulip bubble (again, 1630's) occurred exactly on a double golden mean surge from the year 505 - that's right! THE BIRTH YEAR OF VARAHAMIHIRA, author of PANCASIDDHANTIKA, which is, obviously, one of the most important treatise on early Hindu astronomy and stock picking. Verify my sources, if you must, while I catch my breath!
See india.coolatlanta.com and magicdragon.com
(the latter timeline quite naively states that 505AD was the year Pancasiddhantika was published (the correct year, of course, being 575), when, in fact 505 was the year of Varahamihira's birth, the truly significant event with regard to explaining market fluctuations.) |
