SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Zeev Hed who wrote (8287)11/27/2001 12:50:52 PM
From: orkrious  Read Replies (1) of 99280
 
Zeev, thoughts on this? The guy writes for TSCM.

Jay Shartsis
PUT/CALL RATIOS
11/27/01 12:20 PM ET
Here are some specifics in the put/call complex that should be considered now. Perhaps the most commonly used put/call ratio for the broad market is the volume based equity ratio which simply compares total call volume to total put volume. Much less well known is the "dollar-weighted" put/call ratio (and harder to access, only me and 2 other very high priests know how to get it). I haven't seen any studies that tested its historical accuracy against the volume based ratio but in my experience it is the better. Actually when the volume based and dollar-weighted are both speaking in concert, all the sronger signal. Presently the "dollar-weighted" equity put/call ratio is running near .75 on a 21 day moving average. This is the lowest and most bearish reading since the .70 recorded in September 2000, right before a big market retreat. That's 70 cents in puts traded for every $1.00 in calls.

At the two prior tops of signifiance seen this year this ratio was at about $1.00 in February and about .98 in May. The current .75 is therefore to be respected and is a big reason for my defensive stance here. The traditional volume based equity put/call ratio is now just above the level seen in May and February of this year, so it is not as bearish as the dollar-weighted ratio, but its getting there
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext